Refactoring with Codemods to Automate API Adjustments

Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle

Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to show the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a characteristic
toggle in your
codebase to manage the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the characteristic is dwell in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the following
logical step is to scrub up the toggle and any associated logic.

For example, think about the next code:

const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;

As soon as the characteristic is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
will be simplified to:

const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };

The duty entails discovering all situations of featureToggle within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different characteristic toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement, which can nonetheless be in improvement)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use adjustments selectively.

Understanding the AST

Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet seems in an AST. You need to use instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to grasp the node sorts you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any adjustments.

The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree when it comes to ECMAScript syntax. It
incorporates nodes like Identifier (for variables), StringLiteral (for the
toggle title), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression and
ConditionalExpression.

Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the characteristic toggle test

On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression. The take a look at a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list'). If the take a look at returns true,
the consequent department assigns { title: 'Product' } to knowledge. If
false, the alternate department assigns undefined.

For a job with clear enter and output, I desire writing exams first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a detrimental case to
guarantee we don’t by chance change issues we need to depart untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy state of affairs, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is named inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all exams move.

This method aligns properly with Check-Pushed Improvement (TDD), even
in the event you don’t follow TDD often. Understanding precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.

With jscodeshift, you’ll be able to write exams to confirm how the codemod
behaves:

const remodel = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list");

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };
  `,
  "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator"
);

The defineInlineTest perform from jscodeshift means that you can outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the take a look at’s intent.
Now, working the take a look at with a standard jest command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.

The corresponding detrimental case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different characteristic toggles:

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  "don't change different characteristic toggles"
);

Writing the Codemod

Let’s begin by defining a easy remodel perform. Create a file
known as remodel.js with the next code construction:

module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // manipulate the tree nodes right here

  return root.toSource();
};

This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource().

Now we will begin implementing the remodel steps:

1. Discover all situations of featureToggle.
2. Confirm that the argument handed is 'feature-new-product-list'.
3. Change all the conditional expression with the consequent half,
   successfully eradicating the toggle.

Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift:

module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the take a look at is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
  root
    .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, {
      take a look at: {
        callee: { title: "featureToggle" },
        arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }],
      },
    })
    .forEach((path) => {
      // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent'
      j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent);
    });

  return root.toSource();
};

The codemod above:

• Finds ConditionalExpression nodes the place the take a look at calls
  featureToggle('feature-new-product-list').
• Replaces all the conditional expression with the resultant (i.e., {
title: 'Product' }), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
  behind.

This instance demonstrates how simple it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
handbook effort.

You’ll want to jot down extra take a look at circumstances to deal with variations like
if-else statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')), and so forth to make the
codemod sturdy in real-world eventualities.

As soon as the codemod is prepared, you’ll be able to check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift offers a command-line
device that you need to use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.

$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/

After validating the outcomes, test that each one purposeful exams nonetheless
move and that nothing breaks—even in the event you’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as glad, you’ll be able to commit the adjustments and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.

Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability

Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API adjustments—they’ll
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated characteristic
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled parts. Manually
refactoring these areas will be time-consuming and error-prone.

By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist preserve your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Frequently making use of codemods means that you can
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.

Refactoring an Avatar Part

Now, let’s have a look at a extra complicated instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar element tightly coupled with a
Tooltip. At any time when a consumer passes a title prop into the Avatar, it
robotically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.

Determine 3: A avatar element with a tooltip

Right here’s the present Avatar implementation:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";

const Avatar = ({ title, picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  if (title) {
    return (
      
        
      
    );
  }

  return ;
};

The aim is to decouple the Tooltip from the Avatar element,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to be capable of determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar in a Tooltip. Within the refactored model,
Avatar will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.

Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar:

const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  return ;
};

Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar with a Tooltip as
wanted:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";
import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar";

const UserProfile = () => {
  return (
    
      
    
  );
};

The problem arises when there are a whole bunch of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion can be extremely
inefficient, so we will use a codemod to automate this course of.

Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we will
examine the element and see which nodes signify the Avatar utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar element with each title and picture props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:

Determine 4: AST of the Avatar element utilization

Writing the Codemod

Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:

• Discover Avatar utilization within the element tree.
• Verify if the title prop is current.
• If not, do nothing.
• If current:
• Create a Tooltip node.
• Add the title to the Tooltip.
• Take away the title from Avatar.
• Add Avatar as a baby of the Tooltip.
• Change the unique Avatar node with the brand new Tooltip.

To start, we’ll discover all situations of Avatar (I’ll omit a number of the
exams, however it is best to write comparability exams first).

defineInlineTest(
    { default: remodel, parser: "tsx" },
    {},
    `
    
    `,
    `
    
      
    
    `,
    "wrap avatar with tooltip when title is offered"
  );

Much like the featureToggle instance, we will use root.discover with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    // now we will deal with every Avatar occasion
  });

Subsequent, we test if the title prop is current:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    const avatarNode = path.node;

    const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
      (attr) => attr.title.title === "title"
    );

    if (nameAttr) {
      const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
        nameAttr.worth.worth,
        avatarNode
      );
      j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
    }
  });

For the createTooltipElement perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the title
prop utilized to the Tooltip and the Avatar
element as a baby. Lastly, we name replaceWith to
change the present path.

Right here’s a preview of the way it seems in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the appropriate is the unique code, and the underside
half is the remodeled outcome:

Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase

This codemod searches for all situations of Avatar. If a
title prop is discovered, it removes the title prop
from Avatar, wraps the Avatar inside a
Tooltip, and passes the title prop to the
Tooltip.

By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale adjustments the place
handbook updates can be an enormous burden. Nevertheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear a number of the challenges
and the way we will tackle these less-than-ideal points.

Leveraging Supply Graphs and Check-Pushed Codemods

To deal with these complexities, codemods must be used alongside different
strategies. For example, a couple of years in the past, I participated in a design
system parts rewrite mission at Atlassian. We addressed this subject by
first looking the supply graph, which contained nearly all of inner
element utilization. This allowed us to grasp how parts have been used,
whether or not they have been imported below totally different names, or whether or not sure
public props have been incessantly used. After this search section, we wrote our
take a look at circumstances upfront, guaranteeing we coated nearly all of use circumstances, and
then developed the codemod.

In conditions the place we could not confidently automate the improve, we
inserted feedback or “TODOs” on the name websites. This allowed the
builders working the script to deal with particular circumstances manually. Often,
there have been solely a handful of such situations, so this method nonetheless proved
helpful for upgrading variations.

Using Current Code Standardization Instruments

As you’ll be able to see, there are many edge circumstances to deal with, particularly in
codebases past your management—corresponding to exterior dependencies. This
complexity implies that utilizing codemods requires cautious supervision and a
evaluation of the outcomes.

Nevertheless, in case your codebase has standardization instruments in place, corresponding to a
linter that enforces a specific coding type, you’ll be able to leverage these
instruments to scale back edge circumstances. By imposing a constant construction, instruments
like linters assist slender down the variations in code, making the
transformation simpler and minimizing sudden points.

For example, you might use linting guidelines to limit sure patterns,
corresponding to avoiding nested conditional (ternary) operators or imposing named
exports over default exports. These guidelines assist streamline the codebase,
making codemods extra predictable and efficient.

Moreover, breaking down complicated transformations into smaller, extra
manageable ones means that you can sort out particular person points extra exactly. As
we’ll quickly see, composing smaller codemods could make dealing with complicated
adjustments extra possible.

Codemod Composition

Let’s revisit the characteristic toggle removing instance mentioned earlier. Within the code snippet
now we have a toggle known as feature-convert-new have to be eliminated:

import { featureToggle } from "./utils/featureToggle";

const convertOld = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toLowerCase();
};

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = featureToggle("feature-convert-new")
  ? convertNew("Good day, world")
  : convertOld("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

The codemod for take away a given toggle works superb, and after working the codemod,
we wish the supply to seem like this:

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = convertNew("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

Nevertheless, past eradicating the characteristic toggle logic, there are further duties to
deal with:

• Take away the unused convertOld perform.
• Clear up the unused featureToggle import.

In fact, you might write one massive codemod to deal with all the pieces in a
single move and take a look at it collectively. Nevertheless, a extra maintainable method is
to deal with codemod logic like product code: break the duty into smaller,
unbiased items—identical to how you’d usually refactor manufacturing
code.

Breaking It Down

We are able to break the massive transformation down into smaller codemods and
compose them. The benefit of this method is that every transformation
will be examined individually, masking totally different circumstances with out interference.
Furthermore, it means that you can reuse and compose them for various
functions.

For example, you would possibly break it down like this:

• A change to take away a particular characteristic toggle.
• One other transformation to scrub up unused imports.
• A change to take away unused perform declarations.

By composing these, you’ll be able to create a pipeline of transformations:

import { removeFeatureToggle } from "./remove-feature-toggle";
import { removeUnusedImport } from "./remove-unused-import";
import { removeUnusedFunction } from "./remove-unused-function";

import { createTransformer } from "./utils";

const removeFeatureConvertNew = removeFeatureToggle("feature-convert-new");

const remodel = createTransformer([
  removeFeatureConvertNew,
  removeUnusedImport,
  removeUnusedFunction,
]);

export default remodel;

On this pipeline, the transformations work as follows:

1. Take away the feature-convert-new toggle.
2. Clear up the unused import assertion.
3. Take away the convertOld perform because it’s not used.

Determine 6: Compose transforms into a brand new remodel

You may also extract further codemods as wanted, combining them in
numerous orders relying on the specified final result.

Determine 7: Put totally different transforms right into a pipepline to type one other remodel

The createTransformer Perform

The implementation of the createTransformer perform is comparatively
simple. It acts as a higher-order perform that takes a listing of
smaller remodel features, iterates by the record to use them to
the basis AST, and at last converts the modified AST again into supply
code.

import { API, Assortment, FileInfo, JSCodeshift, Choices } from "jscodeshift";

sort TransformFunction = { (j: JSCodeshift, root: Assortment): void };

const createTransformer =
  (transforms: TransformFunction[]) =>
  (fileInfo: FileInfo, api: API, choices: Choices) => {
    const j = api.jscodeshift;
    const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

    transforms.forEach((remodel) => remodel(j, root));
    return root.toSource(choices.printOptions || { quote: "single" });
  };

export { createTransformer };

For instance, you might have a remodel perform that inlines
expressions assigning the characteristic toggle name to a variable, so in later
transforms you don’t have to fret about these circumstances anymore:

const shouldEnableNewFeature = featureToggle('feature-convert-new');

if (!shouldEnableNewFeature && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Turns into this:

if (!featureToggle('feature-convert-new') && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Over time, you would possibly construct up a set of reusable, smaller
transforms, which might significantly ease the method of dealing with tough edge
circumstances. This method proved extremely efficient in our work refining design
system parts. As soon as we transformed one bundle—such because the button
element—we had a couple of reusable transforms outlined, like including feedback
firstly of features, eradicating deprecated props, or creating aliases
when a bundle is already imported above.

Every of those smaller transforms will be examined and used independently
or mixed for extra complicated transformations, which hurries up subsequent
conversions considerably. Because of this, our refinement work grew to become extra
environment friendly, and these generic codemods are actually relevant to different inner
and even exterior React codebases.

Since every remodel is comparatively standalone, you’ll be able to fine-tune them
with out affecting different transforms or the extra complicated, composed ones. For
occasion, you would possibly re-implement a remodel to enhance efficiency—like
decreasing the variety of node-finding rounds—and with complete take a look at
protection, you are able to do this confidently and safely.

Utilizing JavaParser in a Java Codebase

JavaParser will be helpful for making breaking API adjustments or refactoring
massive Java codebases in a structured, automated approach.

Assume now we have the next code in FeatureToggleExample.java, which
checks the toggle feature-convert-new and branches accordingly:

public class FeatureToggleExample {
    public void execute() {
        if (FeatureToggle.isEnabled("feature-convert-new")) {
          newFeature();
        } else {
          oldFeature();
        }
    }

    void newFeature() {
        System.out.println("New Characteristic Enabled");
    }

    void oldFeature() {
        System.out.println("Outdated Characteristic");
    }
}

We are able to outline a customer to search out if statements checking for
FeatureToggle.isEnabled, after which change them with the corresponding
true department—much like how we dealt with the characteristic toggle codemod in
JavaScript.

// Customer to take away characteristic toggles
class FeatureToggleVisitor extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    @Override
    public void go to(IfStmt ifStmt, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(ifStmt, arg);
        if (ifStmt.getCondition().isMethodCallExpr()) {
            MethodCallExpr methodCall = ifStmt.getCondition().asMethodCallExpr();
            if (methodCall.getNameAsString().equals("isEnabled") &&
                methodCall.getScope().isPresent() &&
                methodCall.getScope().get().toString().equals("FeatureToggle")) {

                BlockStmt thenBlock = ifStmt.getThenStmt().asBlockStmt();
                ifStmt.change(thenBlock);
            }
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer sample utilizing
JavaParser to traverse and manipulate the AST. The
FeatureToggleVisitor seems for if statements
that decision FeatureToggle.isEnabled() and replaces all the
if assertion with the true department.

You may also outline guests to search out unused strategies and take away
them:

class UnusedMethodRemover extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    personal Set calledMethods = new HashSet();
    personal Record methodsToRemove = new ArrayList();

    // Acquire all known as strategies
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodCallExpr n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        calledMethods.add(n.getNameAsString());
    }

    // Acquire strategies to take away if not known as
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodDeclaration n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        String methodName = n.getNameAsString();
        if (!calledMethods.incorporates(methodName) && !methodName.equals("essential")) {
            methodsToRemove.add(n);
        }
    }

    // After visiting, take away the unused strategies
    public void removeUnusedMethods() {
        for (MethodDeclaration methodology : methodsToRemove) {
            methodology.take away();
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer, UnusedMethodRemover, to detect and
take away unused strategies. It tracks all known as strategies within the calledMethods
set and checks every methodology declaration. If a technique isn’t known as and isn’t
essential, it provides it to the record of strategies to take away. As soon as all strategies are
processed, it removes any unused strategies from the AST.

Composing Java Guests

You may chain these guests collectively and apply them to your codebase
like so:

public class FeatureToggleRemoverWithCleanup {
    public static void essential(String[] args) {
        attempt {
            String filePath = "src/take a look at/java/com/instance/Instance.java";
            CompilationUnit cu = StaticJavaParser.parse(new FileInputStream(filePath));

            // Apply transformations
            FeatureToggleVisitor toggleVisitor = new FeatureToggleVisitor();
            cu.settle for(toggleVisitor, null);

            UnusedMethodRemover remover = new UnusedMethodRemover();
            cu.settle for(remover, null);
            remover.removeUnusedMethods();

            // Write the modified code again to the file
            attempt (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(filePath)) {
                fos.write(cu.toString().getBytes());
            }

            System.out.println("Code transformation accomplished efficiently.");
        } catch (IOException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Every customer is a unit of transformation, and the customer sample in
JavaParser makes it simple to compose them.

Variations Between OpenRewrite and JavaParser or jscodeshift

The important thing distinction between OpenRewrite and instruments like JavaParser or
jscodeshift lies of their method to code transformation:

• OpenRewrite’s Lossless Semantic Timber (LSTs) seize each the
  syntactic and semantic that means of the code, enabling extra correct
  transformations.
• JavaParser and jscodeshift depend on conventional ASTs, which focus
  totally on the syntactic construction. Whereas highly effective, they might not at all times
  seize the nuances of how the code behaves semantically.

Moreover, OpenRewrite presents a big library of community-driven
refactoring recipes, making it simpler to use frequent transformations with out
needing to jot down customized codemods from scratch.

Hypermod

Hypermod introduces AI help to the codemod writing course of.
As a substitute of manually crafting the codemod logic, builders can describe
the specified transformation in plain English, and Hypermod will generate
the codemod utilizing jscodeshift. This makes codemod creation extra
accessible, even for builders who might not be accustomed to AST
manipulation.

You may compose, take a look at, and deploy a codemod to any repository
linked to Hypermod. It may possibly run the codemod and generate a pull
request with the proposed adjustments, permitting you to evaluation and approve
them. This integration makes all the course of from codemod improvement
to deployment far more streamlined.

Codemod.com

Codemod.com is a community-driven platform the place builders
can share and uncover codemods. For those who want a particular codemod for a
frequent refactoring job or migration, you’ll be able to seek for present
codemods. Alternatively, you’ll be able to publish codemods you’ve created to assist
others within the developer group.

For those who’re migrating an API and wish a codemod to deal with it,
Codemod.com can prevent time by providing pre-built codemods for
many frequent transformations, decreasing the necessity to write one from
scratch.

Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle

Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to show the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a characteristic
toggle in your
codebase to manage the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the characteristic is dwell in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the following
logical step is to scrub up the toggle and any associated logic.

For example, think about the next code:

const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;

As soon as the characteristic is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
will be simplified to:

const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };

The duty entails discovering all situations of featureToggle within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different characteristic toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement, which can nonetheless be in improvement)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use adjustments selectively.

Understanding the AST

Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet seems in an AST. You need to use instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to grasp the node sorts you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any adjustments.

The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree when it comes to ECMAScript syntax. It
incorporates nodes like Identifier (for variables), StringLiteral (for the
toggle title), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression and
ConditionalExpression.

Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the characteristic toggle test

On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression. The take a look at a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list'). If the take a look at returns true,
the consequent department assigns { title: 'Product' } to knowledge. If
false, the alternate department assigns undefined.

For a job with clear enter and output, I desire writing exams first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a detrimental case to
guarantee we don’t by chance change issues we need to depart untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy state of affairs, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is named inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all exams move.

This method aligns properly with Check-Pushed Improvement (TDD), even
in the event you don’t follow TDD often. Understanding precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.

With jscodeshift, you’ll be able to write exams to confirm how the codemod
behaves:

const remodel = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list");

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };
  `,
  "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator"
);

The defineInlineTest perform from jscodeshift means that you can outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the take a look at’s intent.
Now, working the take a look at with a standard jest command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.

The corresponding detrimental case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different characteristic toggles:

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  "don't change different characteristic toggles"
);

Writing the Codemod

Let’s begin by defining a easy remodel perform. Create a file
known as remodel.js with the next code construction:

module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // manipulate the tree nodes right here

  return root.toSource();
};

This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource().

Now we will begin implementing the remodel steps:

1. Discover all situations of featureToggle.
2. Confirm that the argument handed is 'feature-new-product-list'.
3. Change all the conditional expression with the consequent half,
   successfully eradicating the toggle.

Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift:

module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the take a look at is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
  root
    .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, {
      take a look at: {
        callee: { title: "featureToggle" },
        arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }],
      },
    })
    .forEach((path) => {
      // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent'
      j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent);
    });

  return root.toSource();
};

The codemod above:

• Finds ConditionalExpression nodes the place the take a look at calls
  featureToggle('feature-new-product-list').
• Replaces all the conditional expression with the resultant (i.e., {
title: 'Product' }), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
  behind.

This instance demonstrates how simple it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
handbook effort.

You’ll want to jot down extra take a look at circumstances to deal with variations like
if-else statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')), and so forth to make the
codemod sturdy in real-world eventualities.

As soon as the codemod is prepared, you’ll be able to check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift offers a command-line
device that you need to use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.

$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/

After validating the outcomes, test that each one purposeful exams nonetheless
move and that nothing breaks—even in the event you’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as glad, you’ll be able to commit the adjustments and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.

Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability

Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API adjustments—they’ll
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated characteristic
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled parts. Manually
refactoring these areas will be time-consuming and error-prone.

By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist preserve your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Frequently making use of codemods means that you can
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.

Refactoring an Avatar Part

Now, let’s have a look at a extra complicated instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar element tightly coupled with a
Tooltip. At any time when a consumer passes a title prop into the Avatar, it
robotically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.

Determine 3: A avatar element with a tooltip

Right here’s the present Avatar implementation:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";

const Avatar = ({ title, picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  if (title) {
    return (
      
        
      
    );
  }

  return ;
};

The aim is to decouple the Tooltip from the Avatar element,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to be capable of determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar in a Tooltip. Within the refactored model,
Avatar will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.

Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar:

const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  return ;
};

Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar with a Tooltip as
wanted:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";
import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar";

const UserProfile = () => {
  return (
    
      
    
  );
};

The problem arises when there are a whole bunch of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion can be extremely
inefficient, so we will use a codemod to automate this course of.

Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we will
examine the element and see which nodes signify the Avatar utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar element with each title and picture props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:

Determine 4: AST of the Avatar element utilization

Writing the Codemod

Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:

• Discover Avatar utilization within the element tree.
• Verify if the title prop is current.
• If not, do nothing.
• If current:
• Create a Tooltip node.
• Add the title to the Tooltip.
• Take away the title from Avatar.
• Add Avatar as a baby of the Tooltip.
• Change the unique Avatar node with the brand new Tooltip.

To start, we’ll discover all situations of Avatar (I’ll omit a number of the
exams, however it is best to write comparability exams first).

defineInlineTest(
    { default: remodel, parser: "tsx" },
    {},
    `
    
    `,
    `
    
      
    
    `,
    "wrap avatar with tooltip when title is offered"
  );

Much like the featureToggle instance, we will use root.discover with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    // now we will deal with every Avatar occasion
  });

Subsequent, we test if the title prop is current:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    const avatarNode = path.node;

    const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
      (attr) => attr.title.title === "title"
    );

    if (nameAttr) {
      const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
        nameAttr.worth.worth,
        avatarNode
      );
      j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
    }
  });

For the createTooltipElement perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the title
prop utilized to the Tooltip and the Avatar
element as a baby. Lastly, we name replaceWith to
change the present path.

Right here’s a preview of the way it seems in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the appropriate is the unique code, and the underside
half is the remodeled outcome:

Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase

This codemod searches for all situations of Avatar. If a
title prop is discovered, it removes the title prop
from Avatar, wraps the Avatar inside a
Tooltip, and passes the title prop to the
Tooltip.

By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale adjustments the place
handbook updates can be an enormous burden. Nevertheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear a number of the challenges
and the way we will tackle these less-than-ideal points.

Leveraging Supply Graphs and Check-Pushed Codemods

To deal with these complexities, codemods must be used alongside different
strategies. For example, a couple of years in the past, I participated in a design
system parts rewrite mission at Atlassian. We addressed this subject by
first looking the supply graph, which contained nearly all of inner
element utilization. This allowed us to grasp how parts have been used,
whether or not they have been imported below totally different names, or whether or not sure
public props have been incessantly used. After this search section, we wrote our
take a look at circumstances upfront, guaranteeing we coated nearly all of use circumstances, and
then developed the codemod.

In conditions the place we could not confidently automate the improve, we
inserted feedback or “TODOs” on the name websites. This allowed the
builders working the script to deal with particular circumstances manually. Often,
there have been solely a handful of such situations, so this method nonetheless proved
helpful for upgrading variations.

Using Current Code Standardization Instruments

As you’ll be able to see, there are many edge circumstances to deal with, particularly in
codebases past your management—corresponding to exterior dependencies. This
complexity implies that utilizing codemods requires cautious supervision and a
evaluation of the outcomes.

Nevertheless, in case your codebase has standardization instruments in place, corresponding to a
linter that enforces a specific coding type, you’ll be able to leverage these
instruments to scale back edge circumstances. By imposing a constant construction, instruments
like linters assist slender down the variations in code, making the
transformation simpler and minimizing sudden points.

For example, you might use linting guidelines to limit sure patterns,
corresponding to avoiding nested conditional (ternary) operators or imposing named
exports over default exports. These guidelines assist streamline the codebase,
making codemods extra predictable and efficient.

Moreover, breaking down complicated transformations into smaller, extra
manageable ones means that you can sort out particular person points extra exactly. As
we’ll quickly see, composing smaller codemods could make dealing with complicated
adjustments extra possible.

Codemod Composition

Let’s revisit the characteristic toggle removing instance mentioned earlier. Within the code snippet
now we have a toggle known as feature-convert-new have to be eliminated:

import { featureToggle } from "./utils/featureToggle";

const convertOld = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toLowerCase();
};

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = featureToggle("feature-convert-new")
  ? convertNew("Good day, world")
  : convertOld("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

The codemod for take away a given toggle works superb, and after working the codemod,
we wish the supply to seem like this:

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = convertNew("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

Nevertheless, past eradicating the characteristic toggle logic, there are further duties to
deal with:

• Take away the unused convertOld perform.
• Clear up the unused featureToggle import.

In fact, you might write one massive codemod to deal with all the pieces in a
single move and take a look at it collectively. Nevertheless, a extra maintainable method is
to deal with codemod logic like product code: break the duty into smaller,
unbiased items—identical to how you’d usually refactor manufacturing
code.

Breaking It Down

We are able to break the massive transformation down into smaller codemods and
compose them. The benefit of this method is that every transformation
will be examined individually, masking totally different circumstances with out interference.
Furthermore, it means that you can reuse and compose them for various
functions.

For example, you would possibly break it down like this:

• A change to take away a particular characteristic toggle.
• One other transformation to scrub up unused imports.
• A change to take away unused perform declarations.

By composing these, you’ll be able to create a pipeline of transformations:

import { removeFeatureToggle } from "./remove-feature-toggle";
import { removeUnusedImport } from "./remove-unused-import";
import { removeUnusedFunction } from "./remove-unused-function";

import { createTransformer } from "./utils";

const removeFeatureConvertNew = removeFeatureToggle("feature-convert-new");

const remodel = createTransformer([
  removeFeatureConvertNew,
  removeUnusedImport,
  removeUnusedFunction,
]);

export default remodel;

On this pipeline, the transformations work as follows:

1. Take away the feature-convert-new toggle.
2. Clear up the unused import assertion.
3. Take away the convertOld perform because it’s not used.

Determine 6: Compose transforms into a brand new remodel

You may also extract further codemods as wanted, combining them in
numerous orders relying on the specified final result.

Determine 7: Put totally different transforms right into a pipepline to type one other remodel

The createTransformer Perform

The implementation of the createTransformer perform is comparatively
simple. It acts as a higher-order perform that takes a listing of
smaller remodel features, iterates by the record to use them to
the basis AST, and at last converts the modified AST again into supply
code.

import { API, Assortment, FileInfo, JSCodeshift, Choices } from "jscodeshift";

sort TransformFunction = { (j: JSCodeshift, root: Assortment): void };

const createTransformer =
  (transforms: TransformFunction[]) =>
  (fileInfo: FileInfo, api: API, choices: Choices) => {
    const j = api.jscodeshift;
    const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

    transforms.forEach((remodel) => remodel(j, root));
    return root.toSource(choices.printOptions || { quote: "single" });
  };

export { createTransformer };

For instance, you might have a remodel perform that inlines
expressions assigning the characteristic toggle name to a variable, so in later
transforms you don’t have to fret about these circumstances anymore:

const shouldEnableNewFeature = featureToggle('feature-convert-new');

if (!shouldEnableNewFeature && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Turns into this:

if (!featureToggle('feature-convert-new') && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Over time, you would possibly construct up a set of reusable, smaller
transforms, which might significantly ease the method of dealing with tough edge
circumstances. This method proved extremely efficient in our work refining design
system parts. As soon as we transformed one bundle—such because the button
element—we had a couple of reusable transforms outlined, like including feedback
firstly of features, eradicating deprecated props, or creating aliases
when a bundle is already imported above.

Every of those smaller transforms will be examined and used independently
or mixed for extra complicated transformations, which hurries up subsequent
conversions considerably. Because of this, our refinement work grew to become extra
environment friendly, and these generic codemods are actually relevant to different inner
and even exterior React codebases.

Since every remodel is comparatively standalone, you’ll be able to fine-tune them
with out affecting different transforms or the extra complicated, composed ones. For
occasion, you would possibly re-implement a remodel to enhance efficiency—like
decreasing the variety of node-finding rounds—and with complete take a look at
protection, you are able to do this confidently and safely.

Utilizing JavaParser in a Java Codebase

JavaParser will be helpful for making breaking API adjustments or refactoring
massive Java codebases in a structured, automated approach.

Assume now we have the next code in FeatureToggleExample.java, which
checks the toggle feature-convert-new and branches accordingly:

public class FeatureToggleExample {
    public void execute() {
        if (FeatureToggle.isEnabled("feature-convert-new")) {
          newFeature();
        } else {
          oldFeature();
        }
    }

    void newFeature() {
        System.out.println("New Characteristic Enabled");
    }

    void oldFeature() {
        System.out.println("Outdated Characteristic");
    }
}

We are able to outline a customer to search out if statements checking for
FeatureToggle.isEnabled, after which change them with the corresponding
true department—much like how we dealt with the characteristic toggle codemod in
JavaScript.

// Customer to take away characteristic toggles
class FeatureToggleVisitor extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    @Override
    public void go to(IfStmt ifStmt, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(ifStmt, arg);
        if (ifStmt.getCondition().isMethodCallExpr()) {
            MethodCallExpr methodCall = ifStmt.getCondition().asMethodCallExpr();
            if (methodCall.getNameAsString().equals("isEnabled") &&
                methodCall.getScope().isPresent() &&
                methodCall.getScope().get().toString().equals("FeatureToggle")) {

                BlockStmt thenBlock = ifStmt.getThenStmt().asBlockStmt();
                ifStmt.change(thenBlock);
            }
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer sample utilizing
JavaParser to traverse and manipulate the AST. The
FeatureToggleVisitor seems for if statements
that decision FeatureToggle.isEnabled() and replaces all the
if assertion with the true department.

You may also outline guests to search out unused strategies and take away
them:

class UnusedMethodRemover extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    personal Set calledMethods = new HashSet();
    personal Record methodsToRemove = new ArrayList();

    // Acquire all known as strategies
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodCallExpr n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        calledMethods.add(n.getNameAsString());
    }

    // Acquire strategies to take away if not known as
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodDeclaration n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        String methodName = n.getNameAsString();
        if (!calledMethods.incorporates(methodName) && !methodName.equals("essential")) {
            methodsToRemove.add(n);
        }
    }

    // After visiting, take away the unused strategies
    public void removeUnusedMethods() {
        for (MethodDeclaration methodology : methodsToRemove) {
            methodology.take away();
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer, UnusedMethodRemover, to detect and
take away unused strategies. It tracks all known as strategies within the calledMethods
set and checks every methodology declaration. If a technique isn’t known as and isn’t
essential, it provides it to the record of strategies to take away. As soon as all strategies are
processed, it removes any unused strategies from the AST.

Composing Java Guests

You may chain these guests collectively and apply them to your codebase
like so:

public class FeatureToggleRemoverWithCleanup {
    public static void essential(String[] args) {
        attempt {
            String filePath = "src/take a look at/java/com/instance/Instance.java";
            CompilationUnit cu = StaticJavaParser.parse(new FileInputStream(filePath));

            // Apply transformations
            FeatureToggleVisitor toggleVisitor = new FeatureToggleVisitor();
            cu.settle for(toggleVisitor, null);

            UnusedMethodRemover remover = new UnusedMethodRemover();
            cu.settle for(remover, null);
            remover.removeUnusedMethods();

            // Write the modified code again to the file
            attempt (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(filePath)) {
                fos.write(cu.toString().getBytes());
            }

            System.out.println("Code transformation accomplished efficiently.");
        } catch (IOException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Every customer is a unit of transformation, and the customer sample in
JavaParser makes it simple to compose them.

Variations Between OpenRewrite and JavaParser or jscodeshift

The important thing distinction between OpenRewrite and instruments like JavaParser or
jscodeshift lies of their method to code transformation:

• OpenRewrite’s Lossless Semantic Timber (LSTs) seize each the
  syntactic and semantic that means of the code, enabling extra correct
  transformations.
• JavaParser and jscodeshift depend on conventional ASTs, which focus
  totally on the syntactic construction. Whereas highly effective, they might not at all times
  seize the nuances of how the code behaves semantically.

Moreover, OpenRewrite presents a big library of community-driven
refactoring recipes, making it simpler to use frequent transformations with out
needing to jot down customized codemods from scratch.

Hypermod

Hypermod introduces AI help to the codemod writing course of.
As a substitute of manually crafting the codemod logic, builders can describe
the specified transformation in plain English, and Hypermod will generate
the codemod utilizing jscodeshift. This makes codemod creation extra
accessible, even for builders who might not be accustomed to AST
manipulation.

You may compose, take a look at, and deploy a codemod to any repository
linked to Hypermod. It may possibly run the codemod and generate a pull
request with the proposed adjustments, permitting you to evaluation and approve
them. This integration makes all the course of from codemod improvement
to deployment far more streamlined.

Codemod.com

Codemod.com is a community-driven platform the place builders
can share and uncover codemods. For those who want a particular codemod for a
frequent refactoring job or migration, you’ll be able to seek for present
codemods. Alternatively, you’ll be able to publish codemods you’ve created to assist
others within the developer group.

For those who’re migrating an API and wish a codemod to deal with it,
Codemod.com can prevent time by providing pre-built codemods for
many frequent transformations, decreasing the necessity to write one from
scratch.

Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle

Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to show the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a characteristic
toggle in your
codebase to manage the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the characteristic is dwell in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the following
logical step is to scrub up the toggle and any associated logic.

For example, think about the next code:

const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;

As soon as the characteristic is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
will be simplified to:

const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };

The duty entails discovering all situations of featureToggle within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different characteristic toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement, which can nonetheless be in improvement)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use adjustments selectively.

Understanding the AST

Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet seems in an AST. You need to use instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to grasp the node sorts you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any adjustments.

The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree when it comes to ECMAScript syntax. It
incorporates nodes like Identifier (for variables), StringLiteral (for the
toggle title), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression and
ConditionalExpression.

Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the characteristic toggle test

On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression. The take a look at a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list'). If the take a look at returns true,
the consequent department assigns { title: 'Product' } to knowledge. If
false, the alternate department assigns undefined.

For a job with clear enter and output, I desire writing exams first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a detrimental case to
guarantee we don’t by chance change issues we need to depart untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy state of affairs, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is named inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all exams move.

This method aligns properly with Check-Pushed Improvement (TDD), even
in the event you don’t follow TDD often. Understanding precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.

With jscodeshift, you’ll be able to write exams to confirm how the codemod
behaves:

const remodel = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list");

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };
  `,
  "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator"
);

The defineInlineTest perform from jscodeshift means that you can outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the take a look at’s intent.
Now, working the take a look at with a standard jest command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.

The corresponding detrimental case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different characteristic toggles:

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  "don't change different characteristic toggles"
);

Writing the Codemod

Let’s begin by defining a easy remodel perform. Create a file
known as remodel.js with the next code construction:

module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // manipulate the tree nodes right here

  return root.toSource();
};

This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource().

Now we will begin implementing the remodel steps:

1. Discover all situations of featureToggle.
2. Confirm that the argument handed is 'feature-new-product-list'.
3. Change all the conditional expression with the consequent half,
   successfully eradicating the toggle.

Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift:

module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the take a look at is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
  root
    .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, {
      take a look at: {
        callee: { title: "featureToggle" },
        arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }],
      },
    })
    .forEach((path) => {
      // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent'
      j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent);
    });

  return root.toSource();
};

The codemod above:

• Finds ConditionalExpression nodes the place the take a look at calls
  featureToggle('feature-new-product-list').
• Replaces all the conditional expression with the resultant (i.e., {
title: 'Product' }), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
  behind.

This instance demonstrates how simple it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
handbook effort.

You’ll want to jot down extra take a look at circumstances to deal with variations like
if-else statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')), and so forth to make the
codemod sturdy in real-world eventualities.

As soon as the codemod is prepared, you’ll be able to check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift offers a command-line
device that you need to use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.

$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/

After validating the outcomes, test that each one purposeful exams nonetheless
move and that nothing breaks—even in the event you’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as glad, you’ll be able to commit the adjustments and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.

Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability

Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API adjustments—they’ll
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated characteristic
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled parts. Manually
refactoring these areas will be time-consuming and error-prone.

By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist preserve your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Frequently making use of codemods means that you can
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.

Refactoring an Avatar Part

Now, let’s have a look at a extra complicated instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar element tightly coupled with a
Tooltip. At any time when a consumer passes a title prop into the Avatar, it
robotically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.

Determine 3: A avatar element with a tooltip

Right here’s the present Avatar implementation:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";

const Avatar = ({ title, picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  if (title) {
    return (
      
        
      
    );
  }

  return ;
};

The aim is to decouple the Tooltip from the Avatar element,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to be capable of determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar in a Tooltip. Within the refactored model,
Avatar will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.

Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar:

const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  return ;
};

Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar with a Tooltip as
wanted:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";
import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar";

const UserProfile = () => {
  return (
    
      
    
  );
};

The problem arises when there are a whole bunch of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion can be extremely
inefficient, so we will use a codemod to automate this course of.

Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we will
examine the element and see which nodes signify the Avatar utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar element with each title and picture props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:

Determine 4: AST of the Avatar element utilization

Writing the Codemod

Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:

• Discover Avatar utilization within the element tree.
• Verify if the title prop is current.
• If not, do nothing.
• If current:
• Create a Tooltip node.
• Add the title to the Tooltip.
• Take away the title from Avatar.
• Add Avatar as a baby of the Tooltip.
• Change the unique Avatar node with the brand new Tooltip.

To start, we’ll discover all situations of Avatar (I’ll omit a number of the
exams, however it is best to write comparability exams first).

defineInlineTest(
    { default: remodel, parser: "tsx" },
    {},
    `
    
    `,
    `
    
      
    
    `,
    "wrap avatar with tooltip when title is offered"
  );

Much like the featureToggle instance, we will use root.discover with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    // now we will deal with every Avatar occasion
  });

Subsequent, we test if the title prop is current:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    const avatarNode = path.node;

    const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
      (attr) => attr.title.title === "title"
    );

    if (nameAttr) {
      const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
        nameAttr.worth.worth,
        avatarNode
      );
      j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
    }
  });

For the createTooltipElement perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the title
prop utilized to the Tooltip and the Avatar
element as a baby. Lastly, we name replaceWith to
change the present path.

Right here’s a preview of the way it seems in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the appropriate is the unique code, and the underside
half is the remodeled outcome:

Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase

This codemod searches for all situations of Avatar. If a
title prop is discovered, it removes the title prop
from Avatar, wraps the Avatar inside a
Tooltip, and passes the title prop to the
Tooltip.

By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale adjustments the place
handbook updates can be an enormous burden. Nevertheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear a number of the challenges
and the way we will tackle these less-than-ideal points.

Leveraging Supply Graphs and Check-Pushed Codemods

To deal with these complexities, codemods must be used alongside different
strategies. For example, a couple of years in the past, I participated in a design
system parts rewrite mission at Atlassian. We addressed this subject by
first looking the supply graph, which contained nearly all of inner
element utilization. This allowed us to grasp how parts have been used,
whether or not they have been imported below totally different names, or whether or not sure
public props have been incessantly used. After this search section, we wrote our
take a look at circumstances upfront, guaranteeing we coated nearly all of use circumstances, and
then developed the codemod.

In conditions the place we could not confidently automate the improve, we
inserted feedback or “TODOs” on the name websites. This allowed the
builders working the script to deal with particular circumstances manually. Often,
there have been solely a handful of such situations, so this method nonetheless proved
helpful for upgrading variations.

Using Current Code Standardization Instruments

As you’ll be able to see, there are many edge circumstances to deal with, particularly in
codebases past your management—corresponding to exterior dependencies. This
complexity implies that utilizing codemods requires cautious supervision and a
evaluation of the outcomes.

Nevertheless, in case your codebase has standardization instruments in place, corresponding to a
linter that enforces a specific coding type, you’ll be able to leverage these
instruments to scale back edge circumstances. By imposing a constant construction, instruments
like linters assist slender down the variations in code, making the
transformation simpler and minimizing sudden points.

For example, you might use linting guidelines to limit sure patterns,
corresponding to avoiding nested conditional (ternary) operators or imposing named
exports over default exports. These guidelines assist streamline the codebase,
making codemods extra predictable and efficient.

Moreover, breaking down complicated transformations into smaller, extra
manageable ones means that you can sort out particular person points extra exactly. As
we’ll quickly see, composing smaller codemods could make dealing with complicated
adjustments extra possible.

Codemod Composition

Let’s revisit the characteristic toggle removing instance mentioned earlier. Within the code snippet
now we have a toggle known as feature-convert-new have to be eliminated:

import { featureToggle } from "./utils/featureToggle";

const convertOld = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toLowerCase();
};

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = featureToggle("feature-convert-new")
  ? convertNew("Good day, world")
  : convertOld("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

The codemod for take away a given toggle works superb, and after working the codemod,
we wish the supply to seem like this:

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = convertNew("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

Nevertheless, past eradicating the characteristic toggle logic, there are further duties to
deal with:

• Take away the unused convertOld perform.
• Clear up the unused featureToggle import.

In fact, you might write one massive codemod to deal with all the pieces in a
single move and take a look at it collectively. Nevertheless, a extra maintainable method is
to deal with codemod logic like product code: break the duty into smaller,
unbiased items—identical to how you’d usually refactor manufacturing
code.

Breaking It Down

We are able to break the massive transformation down into smaller codemods and
compose them. The benefit of this method is that every transformation
will be examined individually, masking totally different circumstances with out interference.
Furthermore, it means that you can reuse and compose them for various
functions.

For example, you would possibly break it down like this:

• A change to take away a particular characteristic toggle.
• One other transformation to scrub up unused imports.
• A change to take away unused perform declarations.

By composing these, you’ll be able to create a pipeline of transformations:

import { removeFeatureToggle } from "./remove-feature-toggle";
import { removeUnusedImport } from "./remove-unused-import";
import { removeUnusedFunction } from "./remove-unused-function";

import { createTransformer } from "./utils";

const removeFeatureConvertNew = removeFeatureToggle("feature-convert-new");

const remodel = createTransformer([
  removeFeatureConvertNew,
  removeUnusedImport,
  removeUnusedFunction,
]);

export default remodel;

On this pipeline, the transformations work as follows:

1. Take away the feature-convert-new toggle.
2. Clear up the unused import assertion.
3. Take away the convertOld perform because it’s not used.

Determine 6: Compose transforms into a brand new remodel

You may also extract further codemods as wanted, combining them in
numerous orders relying on the specified final result.

Determine 7: Put totally different transforms right into a pipepline to type one other remodel

The createTransformer Perform

The implementation of the createTransformer perform is comparatively
simple. It acts as a higher-order perform that takes a listing of
smaller remodel features, iterates by the record to use them to
the basis AST, and at last converts the modified AST again into supply
code.

import { API, Assortment, FileInfo, JSCodeshift, Choices } from "jscodeshift";

sort TransformFunction = { (j: JSCodeshift, root: Assortment): void };

const createTransformer =
  (transforms: TransformFunction[]) =>
  (fileInfo: FileInfo, api: API, choices: Choices) => {
    const j = api.jscodeshift;
    const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

    transforms.forEach((remodel) => remodel(j, root));
    return root.toSource(choices.printOptions || { quote: "single" });
  };

export { createTransformer };

For instance, you might have a remodel perform that inlines
expressions assigning the characteristic toggle name to a variable, so in later
transforms you don’t have to fret about these circumstances anymore:

const shouldEnableNewFeature = featureToggle('feature-convert-new');

if (!shouldEnableNewFeature && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Turns into this:

if (!featureToggle('feature-convert-new') && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Over time, you would possibly construct up a set of reusable, smaller
transforms, which might significantly ease the method of dealing with tough edge
circumstances. This method proved extremely efficient in our work refining design
system parts. As soon as we transformed one bundle—such because the button
element—we had a couple of reusable transforms outlined, like including feedback
firstly of features, eradicating deprecated props, or creating aliases
when a bundle is already imported above.

Every of those smaller transforms will be examined and used independently
or mixed for extra complicated transformations, which hurries up subsequent
conversions considerably. Because of this, our refinement work grew to become extra
environment friendly, and these generic codemods are actually relevant to different inner
and even exterior React codebases.

Since every remodel is comparatively standalone, you’ll be able to fine-tune them
with out affecting different transforms or the extra complicated, composed ones. For
occasion, you would possibly re-implement a remodel to enhance efficiency—like
decreasing the variety of node-finding rounds—and with complete take a look at
protection, you are able to do this confidently and safely.

Utilizing JavaParser in a Java Codebase

JavaParser will be helpful for making breaking API adjustments or refactoring
massive Java codebases in a structured, automated approach.

Assume now we have the next code in FeatureToggleExample.java, which
checks the toggle feature-convert-new and branches accordingly:

public class FeatureToggleExample {
    public void execute() {
        if (FeatureToggle.isEnabled("feature-convert-new")) {
          newFeature();
        } else {
          oldFeature();
        }
    }

    void newFeature() {
        System.out.println("New Characteristic Enabled");
    }

    void oldFeature() {
        System.out.println("Outdated Characteristic");
    }
}

We are able to outline a customer to search out if statements checking for
FeatureToggle.isEnabled, after which change them with the corresponding
true department—much like how we dealt with the characteristic toggle codemod in
JavaScript.

// Customer to take away characteristic toggles
class FeatureToggleVisitor extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    @Override
    public void go to(IfStmt ifStmt, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(ifStmt, arg);
        if (ifStmt.getCondition().isMethodCallExpr()) {
            MethodCallExpr methodCall = ifStmt.getCondition().asMethodCallExpr();
            if (methodCall.getNameAsString().equals("isEnabled") &&
                methodCall.getScope().isPresent() &&
                methodCall.getScope().get().toString().equals("FeatureToggle")) {

                BlockStmt thenBlock = ifStmt.getThenStmt().asBlockStmt();
                ifStmt.change(thenBlock);
            }
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer sample utilizing
JavaParser to traverse and manipulate the AST. The
FeatureToggleVisitor seems for if statements
that decision FeatureToggle.isEnabled() and replaces all the
if assertion with the true department.

You may also outline guests to search out unused strategies and take away
them:

class UnusedMethodRemover extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    personal Set calledMethods = new HashSet();
    personal Record methodsToRemove = new ArrayList();

    // Acquire all known as strategies
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodCallExpr n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        calledMethods.add(n.getNameAsString());
    }

    // Acquire strategies to take away if not known as
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodDeclaration n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        String methodName = n.getNameAsString();
        if (!calledMethods.incorporates(methodName) && !methodName.equals("essential")) {
            methodsToRemove.add(n);
        }
    }

    // After visiting, take away the unused strategies
    public void removeUnusedMethods() {
        for (MethodDeclaration methodology : methodsToRemove) {
            methodology.take away();
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer, UnusedMethodRemover, to detect and
take away unused strategies. It tracks all known as strategies within the calledMethods
set and checks every methodology declaration. If a technique isn’t known as and isn’t
essential, it provides it to the record of strategies to take away. As soon as all strategies are
processed, it removes any unused strategies from the AST.

Composing Java Guests

You may chain these guests collectively and apply them to your codebase
like so:

public class FeatureToggleRemoverWithCleanup {
    public static void essential(String[] args) {
        attempt {
            String filePath = "src/take a look at/java/com/instance/Instance.java";
            CompilationUnit cu = StaticJavaParser.parse(new FileInputStream(filePath));

            // Apply transformations
            FeatureToggleVisitor toggleVisitor = new FeatureToggleVisitor();
            cu.settle for(toggleVisitor, null);

            UnusedMethodRemover remover = new UnusedMethodRemover();
            cu.settle for(remover, null);
            remover.removeUnusedMethods();

            // Write the modified code again to the file
            attempt (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(filePath)) {
                fos.write(cu.toString().getBytes());
            }

            System.out.println("Code transformation accomplished efficiently.");
        } catch (IOException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Every customer is a unit of transformation, and the customer sample in
JavaParser makes it simple to compose them.

Variations Between OpenRewrite and JavaParser or jscodeshift

The important thing distinction between OpenRewrite and instruments like JavaParser or
jscodeshift lies of their method to code transformation:

• OpenRewrite’s Lossless Semantic Timber (LSTs) seize each the
  syntactic and semantic that means of the code, enabling extra correct
  transformations.
• JavaParser and jscodeshift depend on conventional ASTs, which focus
  totally on the syntactic construction. Whereas highly effective, they might not at all times
  seize the nuances of how the code behaves semantically.

Moreover, OpenRewrite presents a big library of community-driven
refactoring recipes, making it simpler to use frequent transformations with out
needing to jot down customized codemods from scratch.

Hypermod

Hypermod introduces AI help to the codemod writing course of.
As a substitute of manually crafting the codemod logic, builders can describe
the specified transformation in plain English, and Hypermod will generate
the codemod utilizing jscodeshift. This makes codemod creation extra
accessible, even for builders who might not be accustomed to AST
manipulation.

You may compose, take a look at, and deploy a codemod to any repository
linked to Hypermod. It may possibly run the codemod and generate a pull
request with the proposed adjustments, permitting you to evaluation and approve
them. This integration makes all the course of from codemod improvement
to deployment far more streamlined.

Codemod.com

Codemod.com is a community-driven platform the place builders
can share and uncover codemods. For those who want a particular codemod for a
frequent refactoring job or migration, you’ll be able to seek for present
codemods. Alternatively, you’ll be able to publish codemods you’ve created to assist
others within the developer group.

For those who’re migrating an API and wish a codemod to deal with it,
Codemod.com can prevent time by providing pre-built codemods for
many frequent transformations, decreasing the necessity to write one from
scratch.

Clear a Stale Characteristic Toggle

Let’s begin with a easy but sensible instance to show the
energy of codemods. Think about you’re utilizing a characteristic
toggle in your
codebase to manage the discharge of unfinished or experimental options.
As soon as the characteristic is dwell in manufacturing and dealing as anticipated, the following
logical step is to scrub up the toggle and any associated logic.

For example, think about the next code:

const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;

As soon as the characteristic is absolutely launched and not wants a toggle, this
will be simplified to:

const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };

The duty entails discovering all situations of featureToggle within the
codebase, checking whether or not the toggle refers to
feature-new-product-list, and eradicating the conditional logic surrounding
it. On the similar time, different characteristic toggles (like
feature-search-result-refinement, which can nonetheless be in improvement)
ought to stay untouched. The codemod must perceive the construction
of the code to use adjustments selectively.

Understanding the AST

Earlier than we dive into writing the codemod, let’s break down how this
particular code snippet seems in an AST. You need to use instruments like AST
Explorer to visualise how supply code and AST
are mapped. It’s useful to grasp the node sorts you are interacting
with earlier than making use of any adjustments.

The picture beneath reveals the syntax tree when it comes to ECMAScript syntax. It
incorporates nodes like Identifier (for variables), StringLiteral (for the
toggle title), and extra summary nodes like CallExpression and
ConditionalExpression.

Determine 2: The Summary Syntax Tree illustration of the characteristic toggle test

On this AST illustration, the variable knowledge is assigned utilizing a
ConditionalExpression. The take a look at a part of the expression calls
featureToggle('feature-new-product-list'). If the take a look at returns true,
the consequent department assigns { title: 'Product' } to knowledge. If
false, the alternate department assigns undefined.

For a job with clear enter and output, I desire writing exams first,
then implementing the codemod. I begin by defining a detrimental case to
guarantee we don’t by chance change issues we need to depart untouched,
adopted by an actual case that performs the precise conversion. I start with
a easy state of affairs, implement it, then add a variation (like checking if
featureToggle is named inside an if assertion), implement that case, and
guarantee all exams move.

This method aligns properly with Check-Pushed Improvement (TDD), even
in the event you don’t follow TDD often. Understanding precisely what the
transformation’s inputs and outputs are earlier than coding improves security and
effectivity, particularly when tweaking codemods.

With jscodeshift, you’ll be able to write exams to confirm how the codemod
behaves:

const remodel = require("../remove-feature-new-product-list");

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-new-product-list') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = { title: 'Product' };
  `,
  "delete the toggle feature-new-product-list in conditional operator"
);

The defineInlineTest perform from jscodeshift means that you can outline
the enter, anticipated output, and a string describing the take a look at’s intent.
Now, working the take a look at with a standard jest command will fail as a result of the
codemod isn’t written but.

The corresponding detrimental case would make sure the code stays unchanged
for different characteristic toggles:

defineInlineTest(
  remodel,
  {},
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  `
  const knowledge = featureToggle('feature-search-result-refinement') ? { title: 'Product' } : undefined;
  `,
  "don't change different characteristic toggles"
);

Writing the Codemod

Let’s begin by defining a easy remodel perform. Create a file
known as remodel.js with the next code construction:

module.exports = perform(fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // manipulate the tree nodes right here

  return root.toSource();
};

This perform reads the file right into a tree and makes use of jscodeshift’s API to
question, modify, and replace the nodes. Lastly, it converts the AST again to
supply code with .toSource().

Now we will begin implementing the remodel steps:

1. Discover all situations of featureToggle.
2. Confirm that the argument handed is 'feature-new-product-list'.
3. Change all the conditional expression with the consequent half,
   successfully eradicating the toggle.

Right here’s how we obtain this utilizing jscodeshift:

module.exports = perform (fileInfo, api, choices) {
  const j = api.jscodeshift;
  const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

  // Discover ConditionalExpression the place the take a look at is featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')
  root
    .discover(j.ConditionalExpression, {
      take a look at: {
        callee: { title: "featureToggle" },
        arguments: [{ value: "feature-new-product-list" }],
      },
    })
    .forEach((path) => {
      // Change the ConditionalExpression with the 'consequent'
      j(path).replaceWith(path.node.consequent);
    });

  return root.toSource();
};

The codemod above:

• Finds ConditionalExpression nodes the place the take a look at calls
  featureToggle('feature-new-product-list').
• Replaces all the conditional expression with the resultant (i.e., {
title: 'Product' }), eradicating the toggle logic and leaving simplified code
  behind.

This instance demonstrates how simple it’s to create a helpful
transformation and apply it to a big codebase, considerably decreasing
handbook effort.

You’ll want to jot down extra take a look at circumstances to deal with variations like
if-else statements, logical expressions (e.g.,
!featureToggle('feature-new-product-list')), and so forth to make the
codemod sturdy in real-world eventualities.

As soon as the codemod is prepared, you’ll be able to check it out on a goal codebase,
such because the one you are engaged on. jscodeshift offers a command-line
device that you need to use to use the codemod and report the outcomes.

$ jscodeshift -t transform-name src/

After validating the outcomes, test that each one purposeful exams nonetheless
move and that nothing breaks—even in the event you’re introducing a breaking change.
As soon as glad, you’ll be able to commit the adjustments and lift a pull request as
a part of your regular workflow.

Codemods Enhance Code High quality and Maintainability

Codemods aren’t simply helpful for managing breaking API adjustments—they’ll
considerably enhance code high quality and maintainability. As codebases
evolve, they usually accumulate technical debt, together with outdated characteristic
toggles, deprecated strategies, or tightly coupled parts. Manually
refactoring these areas will be time-consuming and error-prone.

By automating refactoring duties, codemods assist preserve your codebase clear
and freed from legacy patterns. Frequently making use of codemods means that you can
implement new coding requirements, take away unused code, and modernize your
codebase with out having to manually modify each file.

Refactoring an Avatar Part

Now, let’s have a look at a extra complicated instance. Suppose you’re working with
a design system that features an Avatar element tightly coupled with a
Tooltip. At any time when a consumer passes a title prop into the Avatar, it
robotically wraps the avatar with a tooltip.

Determine 3: A avatar element with a tooltip

Right here’s the present Avatar implementation:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";

const Avatar = ({ title, picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  if (title) {
    return (
      
        
      
    );
  }

  return ;
};

The aim is to decouple the Tooltip from the Avatar element,
giving builders extra flexibility. Builders ought to be capable of determine
whether or not to wrap the Avatar in a Tooltip. Within the refactored model,
Avatar will merely render the picture, and customers can apply a Tooltip
manually if wanted.

Right here’s the refactored model of Avatar:

const Avatar = ({ picture }: AvatarProps) => {
  return ;
};

Now, customers can manually wrap the Avatar with a Tooltip as
wanted:

import { Tooltip } from "@design-system/tooltip";
import { Avatar } from "@design-system/avatar";

const UserProfile = () => {
  return (
    
      
    
  );
};

The problem arises when there are a whole bunch of Avatar usages unfold
throughout the codebase. Manually refactoring every occasion can be extremely
inefficient, so we will use a codemod to automate this course of.

Utilizing instruments like AST Explorer, we will
examine the element and see which nodes signify the Avatar utilization
we’re focusing on. An Avatar element with each title and picture props
is parsed into an summary syntax tree as proven beneath:

Determine 4: AST of the Avatar element utilization

Writing the Codemod

Let’s break down the transformation into smaller duties:

• Discover Avatar utilization within the element tree.
• Verify if the title prop is current.
• If not, do nothing.
• If current:
• Create a Tooltip node.
• Add the title to the Tooltip.
• Take away the title from Avatar.
• Add Avatar as a baby of the Tooltip.
• Change the unique Avatar node with the brand new Tooltip.

To start, we’ll discover all situations of Avatar (I’ll omit a number of the
exams, however it is best to write comparability exams first).

defineInlineTest(
    { default: remodel, parser: "tsx" },
    {},
    `
    
    `,
    `
    
      
    
    `,
    "wrap avatar with tooltip when title is offered"
  );

Much like the featureToggle instance, we will use root.discover with
search standards to find all Avatar nodes:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    // now we will deal with every Avatar occasion
  });

Subsequent, we test if the title prop is current:

root
  .discover(j.JSXElement, {
    openingElement: { title: { title: "Avatar" } },
  })
  .forEach((path) => {
    const avatarNode = path.node;

    const nameAttr = avatarNode.openingElement.attributes.discover(
      (attr) => attr.title.title === "title"
    );

    if (nameAttr) {
      const tooltipElement = createTooltipElement(
        nameAttr.worth.worth,
        avatarNode
      );
      j(path).replaceWith(tooltipElement);
    }
  });

For the createTooltipElement perform, we use the
jscodeshift API to create a brand new JSX node, with the title
prop utilized to the Tooltip and the Avatar
element as a baby. Lastly, we name replaceWith to
change the present path.

Right here’s a preview of the way it seems in
Hypermod, the place the codemod is written on
the left. The highest half on the appropriate is the unique code, and the underside
half is the remodeled outcome:

Determine 5: Run checks inside hypermod earlier than apply it to your codebase

This codemod searches for all situations of Avatar. If a
title prop is discovered, it removes the title prop
from Avatar, wraps the Avatar inside a
Tooltip, and passes the title prop to the
Tooltip.

By now, I hope it’s clear that codemods are extremely helpful and
that the workflow is intuitive, particularly for large-scale adjustments the place
handbook updates can be an enormous burden. Nevertheless, that is not the entire
image. Within the subsequent part, I’ll make clear a number of the challenges
and the way we will tackle these less-than-ideal points.

Leveraging Supply Graphs and Check-Pushed Codemods

To deal with these complexities, codemods must be used alongside different
strategies. For example, a couple of years in the past, I participated in a design
system parts rewrite mission at Atlassian. We addressed this subject by
first looking the supply graph, which contained nearly all of inner
element utilization. This allowed us to grasp how parts have been used,
whether or not they have been imported below totally different names, or whether or not sure
public props have been incessantly used. After this search section, we wrote our
take a look at circumstances upfront, guaranteeing we coated nearly all of use circumstances, and
then developed the codemod.

In conditions the place we could not confidently automate the improve, we
inserted feedback or “TODOs” on the name websites. This allowed the
builders working the script to deal with particular circumstances manually. Often,
there have been solely a handful of such situations, so this method nonetheless proved
helpful for upgrading variations.

Using Current Code Standardization Instruments

As you’ll be able to see, there are many edge circumstances to deal with, particularly in
codebases past your management—corresponding to exterior dependencies. This
complexity implies that utilizing codemods requires cautious supervision and a
evaluation of the outcomes.

Nevertheless, in case your codebase has standardization instruments in place, corresponding to a
linter that enforces a specific coding type, you’ll be able to leverage these
instruments to scale back edge circumstances. By imposing a constant construction, instruments
like linters assist slender down the variations in code, making the
transformation simpler and minimizing sudden points.

For example, you might use linting guidelines to limit sure patterns,
corresponding to avoiding nested conditional (ternary) operators or imposing named
exports over default exports. These guidelines assist streamline the codebase,
making codemods extra predictable and efficient.

Moreover, breaking down complicated transformations into smaller, extra
manageable ones means that you can sort out particular person points extra exactly. As
we’ll quickly see, composing smaller codemods could make dealing with complicated
adjustments extra possible.

Codemod Composition

Let’s revisit the characteristic toggle removing instance mentioned earlier. Within the code snippet
now we have a toggle known as feature-convert-new have to be eliminated:

import { featureToggle } from "./utils/featureToggle";

const convertOld = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toLowerCase();
};

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = featureToggle("feature-convert-new")
  ? convertNew("Good day, world")
  : convertOld("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

The codemod for take away a given toggle works superb, and after working the codemod,
we wish the supply to seem like this:

const convertNew = (enter: string) => {
  return enter.toUpperCase();
};

const outcome = convertNew("Good day, world");

console.log(outcome);

Nevertheless, past eradicating the characteristic toggle logic, there are further duties to
deal with:

• Take away the unused convertOld perform.
• Clear up the unused featureToggle import.

In fact, you might write one massive codemod to deal with all the pieces in a
single move and take a look at it collectively. Nevertheless, a extra maintainable method is
to deal with codemod logic like product code: break the duty into smaller,
unbiased items—identical to how you’d usually refactor manufacturing
code.

Breaking It Down

We are able to break the massive transformation down into smaller codemods and
compose them. The benefit of this method is that every transformation
will be examined individually, masking totally different circumstances with out interference.
Furthermore, it means that you can reuse and compose them for various
functions.

For example, you would possibly break it down like this:

• A change to take away a particular characteristic toggle.
• One other transformation to scrub up unused imports.
• A change to take away unused perform declarations.

By composing these, you’ll be able to create a pipeline of transformations:

import { removeFeatureToggle } from "./remove-feature-toggle";
import { removeUnusedImport } from "./remove-unused-import";
import { removeUnusedFunction } from "./remove-unused-function";

import { createTransformer } from "./utils";

const removeFeatureConvertNew = removeFeatureToggle("feature-convert-new");

const remodel = createTransformer([
  removeFeatureConvertNew,
  removeUnusedImport,
  removeUnusedFunction,
]);

export default remodel;

On this pipeline, the transformations work as follows:

1. Take away the feature-convert-new toggle.
2. Clear up the unused import assertion.
3. Take away the convertOld perform because it’s not used.

Determine 6: Compose transforms into a brand new remodel

You may also extract further codemods as wanted, combining them in
numerous orders relying on the specified final result.

Determine 7: Put totally different transforms right into a pipepline to type one other remodel

The createTransformer Perform

The implementation of the createTransformer perform is comparatively
simple. It acts as a higher-order perform that takes a listing of
smaller remodel features, iterates by the record to use them to
the basis AST, and at last converts the modified AST again into supply
code.

import { API, Assortment, FileInfo, JSCodeshift, Choices } from "jscodeshift";

sort TransformFunction = { (j: JSCodeshift, root: Assortment): void };

const createTransformer =
  (transforms: TransformFunction[]) =>
  (fileInfo: FileInfo, api: API, choices: Choices) => {
    const j = api.jscodeshift;
    const root = j(fileInfo.supply);

    transforms.forEach((remodel) => remodel(j, root));
    return root.toSource(choices.printOptions || { quote: "single" });
  };

export { createTransformer };

For instance, you might have a remodel perform that inlines
expressions assigning the characteristic toggle name to a variable, so in later
transforms you don’t have to fret about these circumstances anymore:

const shouldEnableNewFeature = featureToggle('feature-convert-new');

if (!shouldEnableNewFeature && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Turns into this:

if (!featureToggle('feature-convert-new') && someOtherLogic) {
  //...
}

Over time, you would possibly construct up a set of reusable, smaller
transforms, which might significantly ease the method of dealing with tough edge
circumstances. This method proved extremely efficient in our work refining design
system parts. As soon as we transformed one bundle—such because the button
element—we had a couple of reusable transforms outlined, like including feedback
firstly of features, eradicating deprecated props, or creating aliases
when a bundle is already imported above.

Every of those smaller transforms will be examined and used independently
or mixed for extra complicated transformations, which hurries up subsequent
conversions considerably. Because of this, our refinement work grew to become extra
environment friendly, and these generic codemods are actually relevant to different inner
and even exterior React codebases.

Since every remodel is comparatively standalone, you’ll be able to fine-tune them
with out affecting different transforms or the extra complicated, composed ones. For
occasion, you would possibly re-implement a remodel to enhance efficiency—like
decreasing the variety of node-finding rounds—and with complete take a look at
protection, you are able to do this confidently and safely.

Utilizing JavaParser in a Java Codebase

JavaParser will be helpful for making breaking API adjustments or refactoring
massive Java codebases in a structured, automated approach.

Assume now we have the next code in FeatureToggleExample.java, which
checks the toggle feature-convert-new and branches accordingly:

public class FeatureToggleExample {
    public void execute() {
        if (FeatureToggle.isEnabled("feature-convert-new")) {
          newFeature();
        } else {
          oldFeature();
        }
    }

    void newFeature() {
        System.out.println("New Characteristic Enabled");
    }

    void oldFeature() {
        System.out.println("Outdated Characteristic");
    }
}

We are able to outline a customer to search out if statements checking for
FeatureToggle.isEnabled, after which change them with the corresponding
true department—much like how we dealt with the characteristic toggle codemod in
JavaScript.

// Customer to take away characteristic toggles
class FeatureToggleVisitor extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    @Override
    public void go to(IfStmt ifStmt, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(ifStmt, arg);
        if (ifStmt.getCondition().isMethodCallExpr()) {
            MethodCallExpr methodCall = ifStmt.getCondition().asMethodCallExpr();
            if (methodCall.getNameAsString().equals("isEnabled") &&
                methodCall.getScope().isPresent() &&
                methodCall.getScope().get().toString().equals("FeatureToggle")) {

                BlockStmt thenBlock = ifStmt.getThenStmt().asBlockStmt();
                ifStmt.change(thenBlock);
            }
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer sample utilizing
JavaParser to traverse and manipulate the AST. The
FeatureToggleVisitor seems for if statements
that decision FeatureToggle.isEnabled() and replaces all the
if assertion with the true department.

You may also outline guests to search out unused strategies and take away
them:

class UnusedMethodRemover extends VoidVisitorAdapter {
    personal Set calledMethods = new HashSet();
    personal Record methodsToRemove = new ArrayList();

    // Acquire all known as strategies
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodCallExpr n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        calledMethods.add(n.getNameAsString());
    }

    // Acquire strategies to take away if not known as
    @Override
    public void go to(MethodDeclaration n, Void arg) {
        tremendous.go to(n, arg);
        String methodName = n.getNameAsString();
        if (!calledMethods.incorporates(methodName) && !methodName.equals("essential")) {
            methodsToRemove.add(n);
        }
    }

    // After visiting, take away the unused strategies
    public void removeUnusedMethods() {
        for (MethodDeclaration methodology : methodsToRemove) {
            methodology.take away();
        }
    }
}

This code defines a customer, UnusedMethodRemover, to detect and
take away unused strategies. It tracks all known as strategies within the calledMethods
set and checks every methodology declaration. If a technique isn’t known as and isn’t
essential, it provides it to the record of strategies to take away. As soon as all strategies are
processed, it removes any unused strategies from the AST.

Composing Java Guests

You may chain these guests collectively and apply them to your codebase
like so:

public class FeatureToggleRemoverWithCleanup {
    public static void essential(String[] args) {
        attempt {
            String filePath = "src/take a look at/java/com/instance/Instance.java";
            CompilationUnit cu = StaticJavaParser.parse(new FileInputStream(filePath));

            // Apply transformations
            FeatureToggleVisitor toggleVisitor = new FeatureToggleVisitor();
            cu.settle for(toggleVisitor, null);

            UnusedMethodRemover remover = new UnusedMethodRemover();
            cu.settle for(remover, null);
            remover.removeUnusedMethods();

            // Write the modified code again to the file
            attempt (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(filePath)) {
                fos.write(cu.toString().getBytes());
            }

            System.out.println("Code transformation accomplished efficiently.");
        } catch (IOException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}

Every customer is a unit of transformation, and the customer sample in
JavaParser makes it simple to compose them.

Variations Between OpenRewrite and JavaParser or jscodeshift

The important thing distinction between OpenRewrite and instruments like JavaParser or
jscodeshift lies of their method to code transformation:

• OpenRewrite’s Lossless Semantic Timber (LSTs) seize each the
  syntactic and semantic that means of the code, enabling extra correct
  transformations.
• JavaParser and jscodeshift depend on conventional ASTs, which focus
  totally on the syntactic construction. Whereas highly effective, they might not at all times
  seize the nuances of how the code behaves semantically.

Moreover, OpenRewrite presents a big library of community-driven
refactoring recipes, making it simpler to use frequent transformations with out
needing to jot down customized codemods from scratch.

Hypermod

Hypermod introduces AI help to the codemod writing course of.
As a substitute of manually crafting the codemod logic, builders can describe
the specified transformation in plain English, and Hypermod will generate
the codemod utilizing jscodeshift. This makes codemod creation extra
accessible, even for builders who might not be accustomed to AST
manipulation.

You may compose, take a look at, and deploy a codemod to any repository
linked to Hypermod. It may possibly run the codemod and generate a pull
request with the proposed adjustments, permitting you to evaluation and approve
them. This integration makes all the course of from codemod improvement
to deployment far more streamlined.

Codemod.com

Codemod.com is a community-driven platform the place builders
can share and uncover codemods. For those who want a particular codemod for a
frequent refactoring job or migration, you’ll be able to seek for present
codemods. Alternatively, you’ll be able to publish codemods you’ve created to assist
others within the developer group.

For those who’re migrating an API and wish a codemod to deal with it,
Codemod.com can prevent time by providing pre-built codemods for
many frequent transformations, decreasing the necessity to write one from
scratch.